Sure iPhone is nice. But first, and foremost, most important thing about a cellphone is the carrier.
I’ve been having some annoying problems with my LG Chocolate phone. First, the touch keys started acting weird. I would have to press various parts of the phone to activate “Send” function which was not working. That is not at all annoying compared to the other problem — my phone dialed random contacts at wee hours in the morning. Just the other night, it called Migi 5 o’clock in the morning and, well, she was kinda freaked out about it.
That put me over the edge and so I wrote a complaint email to Verizon Customer Service. I wasn’t expecting much, really. I figured I steam off before I switch to AT&T and ride the iPhone bandwagon. But to my surprise, they offered to FedEx me a new phone for free of charge! (It’s the same LG Chocolate, but they claim that this problem has been addressed by LG, so I’m optimistic).
I just got my replacement phone, and I am more excited about it than I would be with an iPhone, because more important than just a gadget, it felt really good to be treated so nicely as a customer. I’ve been with Verizon for more than 7 years now. And I can say for certain, that I will continue to, for the foreseeable future. Kudos to Verizon!
ps: ok, maybe that was stretching a bit. iPhone still rocks, and I can’t wait until iPhone is availble on Verizon!!! :D
BIGGEST DRAWING IN THE WORLD
… or the worst case of narcissism? :D
[via]
Could ‘electric computers’ be the new iPhone? - The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW)
An unusually-large shipment of 188 mysterious containers has arrived in North America from Apple’s manufacturing partners in China. The contents? “Electric computers,” a term that Apple has never before used on its customs declarations.
Good gawd, they are tracking container ships now?? (ok, I admit I was tracking container ship for my Euro-delivery :D)
These iPhone fan boys must be wetting their pants right now (if that’s an improv, it’s brilliant! :D)
With a back-to-back natural disasters in the Far East region of the world, we see lot of death toll numbers in news headlines these days. It’s always too depressing to read, but after the initial shock and disbelief, most of us suffer from number numbness.
I always wondered how accurate are these casualty numbers are. When I first heard of the cyclone in Burma on the radio, I heard 400 deaths. Now the number of casualty is estimated anywhere between 63,833 to 127,990 (or 1.5 million if you project the death toll, caused by the after effects of disasters, such as diseases and famine). Slate has a good article on how different organizations come up with these figures.
And this lack of accurate figure is not because Burma and China are less technologically advanced than the Western countries (although “government” red-tapes do not help). I remember that it took months for US to come up with an accurate number of people who perished from 9/11 attacks.
For the adventure story fans out there. Catch this Frontline episode about the 1996 Everest disaster told by David Breashears, one of the IMAX film maker who was on the mountain at the time. Bound to be awesome.
If you crave for more, I highly recommend Jon Krakauer’s Into Thin Air. It makes you want to go climb Everest but have second thoughts about it, at the same time.
Latest Comments
RSS